Neighbors, house-wars, and handshakes

It takes less than you might think to be a truly great neighbor. When kids were left to run the house, the house nearly didn't survive. Plus, want to live to be 100? Get a grip!

The Daily GOOD logo

“The fate of your heart is your choice and no one else gets a vote.”
 ― Sarah Dessen

In this issue...

Culture

A Miss Manners letter, a texting freeloader, and a few habits that might save your street.

Here's something nobody tells you when you move in next door to someone: the research bar for "good neighbor" is genuinely low. Not in a depressing way, in a relieving one. As Mark Wales reports, a stack of studies backs up what most of us already sense, that the basics go a long way, and most of us are already halfway there.

Mark lays out five habits backed by actual research. A 2022 study of nearly 28,000 people found neighborhood social cohesion has measurable cardiovascular benefits. A 2025 University of Washington study found neighbors who share resources during a disaster nearly eliminate community-wide shortages. A licensed therapist also offers a genuinely useful move for defusing a grievance before it curdles into a feud.

The most counterintuitive finding lands last: clutter isn't just an eyesore. A 2021 study linked it to your own rising stress and anxiety, which means your messy yard is quietly working against you, too. The five habits aren't about being perfect. They're about being the kind of person your street appreciates without ever having to say so.

Image of the Day

All GOOD reader Mary Ann told me about this pastoral image was that it was of a sunset down on the farm, and honestly, that’s exactly enough information for such an elegantly composed shot.

Do you have a GOOD picture to share?

Send us your best images, and we may feature them as the image of the day. Be sure to tell us a bit about your pic.

Bad news is good business. Not everyone buys it.

Markets move. Headlines catastrophize. But somewhere inside the noise is the story that matters — the opportunity, not the fear. 

The Daily Upside was built by Wall Street insiders to find it — global business and finance, reported without the alarm.

A GOOD Question

How well do you actually know your neighbors?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

And did we know?

Yesterday, we shared the fascinating phenomenon of fathers stepping up just as the traditional village has stepped aside. It got me thinking about dads in general, and with Father’s Day coming up this weekend, I thought it would be fun to have a little quiz.

How long was the gap between the official creation of Mother’s Day and the official creation of Father’s Day? Only 19% of you got the right answer! It took almost 60 years for dads to get a day of their own.

  • They were created the same year (13.4%)

  • 2 years (13.4%)

  • 29 years (54.3%)

  • 58 years (18.9%) ⭐

Culture

One house threw a fashion show. The other one threw everything.

My 14-year-old is home for summer vacation, and our house is often a lot worse for it. And that's just one kid! Imagine ten of them, no parents, five whole days. That's the premise of Boys and Girls Alone, a Channel 4 documentary from the mid-2000s that keeps resurfacing online, and as Adam Albright Hanna reports, it won't go away because it's uncomfortably clarifying.

Twenty kids, ages 11 and 12, were split into two gender-separated houses stocked with food, cleaning supplies, toys, and paints. Camera crew present, instructed not to interfere. In the boys' house, the unraveling started within hours.

The girls' house looked like a different civilization. Cooking roster, day one. Cakes baked. Fashion show organized. A chores list, drawn up and enforced. One house ran like a small society. The other tested the structural limits of drywall.

The documentary was controversial when it aired, but the footage keeps coming back because it isn't really about what those 20 kids did. It's about what they'd already been taught to do long before anyone put them in a house together, and whether that's a nature story or a nurture story is the question it keeps asking without quite answering. Two decades later, people are still watching. Still arguing. Still not sure.

Care

Blood panels, imaging scans, wearable biometrics… they got nothing on the tennis ball in your drawer.

You can tell a lot by a good, firm handshake, and apparently, one of those things is how long the person you're greeting is going to live. As Erik Barnes reports, in an era when people spend small fortunes on bloodwork, MRI scans, and glucose monitors, the most telling longevity metric may be embarrassingly low-tech.

A 44-year study tracked participants from middle age into their hundreds. The ones who reached 100 were 2.5 times more likely to have ranked in the top third for grip strength throughout. Researchers think the link runs deep, since grip reflects muscle and bone mass retention, cardiovascular stamina, and the absence of conditions like high blood pressure that quietly erode the body over time. Dr. Guillaume Paré of McMaster University says a weak handshake is one of the first things he looks for. "Weaker handshakes where fingers struggle to close completely around my hand, or where hand muscles are emaciated, are red flags," he told the BBC.

Today in History

On June 18, 1873, in a courtroom in Canandaigua, New York, Susan B. Anthony was found guilty of a federal crime: casting a ballot in a presidential election. She had walked into a voter registration office the previous November, argued her way onto the rolls by citing the 14th Amendment, and voted for Ulysses S. Grant. Then she waited to be arrested. It took two weeks. The charge was violating the Enforcement Act of 1870, which prohibited anyone from voting "without having a lawful right to vote." In the eyes of the United States government, that described Susan B. Anthony perfectly.

The trial was something of a formality. Judge Ward Hunt had written his decision before the proceedings began, kept Anthony from testifying, and when arguments concluded, pulled a paper from his pocket and read his ruling aloud. He then directed the all-male jury to return a verdict of guilty, skipping deliberation entirely. That move was later declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. When Hunt asked Anthony if she had anything to say before sentencing, he probably regretted it. She launched into what historians now call the most famous speech in the history of the suffrage movement, repeatedly ignoring his orders to sit down.

The fine was $100. Anthony told the judge directly: "I will never pay a dollar of your unjust penalty." Hunt, knowing that jailing her would let her appeal to the Supreme Court, released her without confinement. It was a neat legal trap, and she wore the conviction as a badge of honor for the rest of her life. She never paid. Neither the court nor the government ever collected.

Do you have something GOOD to share?

We’re always on the lookout for uplifting, enlightening, and engaging content to share with readers like you. If you have something you think should be featured in the Daily GOOD, let me know!

💬 From the group text…

It’s only Thursday, but it feels like it has been a long week. Here’s a porcupine noshing carrots to brighten your entire day!

Join the Group Text! Send us your social media gold.

Until next week, have a wonderful Juneteenth. I’m back on Monday.